| | Topic : shorty TOR's compared to long TOR's? | |
| | CornerBanger | Jupiter | | | Reg. Date | : | 07/07/2010 | Posts | : | 1,113 | Location | : | Charleston, SC, United States |
|
| Posted : 12 Nov 2010 - 16:13 Post title : Re: shorty TOR's compared to long TOR's? (Re: DizzE) | |
DizzE wrote:
Well, you know I wouldn't lie...there is no profit, Feringe.
But, for you, since they are just sitting there, I re-checked.
One Long pipe = 11 lbs |
|
You Star Trek New Generation "Humon" freak... lol
| There are those who own and there are those who ride!
2010 Thunderbird 2007 Kawi KX250F 2010 Kawi KX85 (My boy's ride)
|
|
| | DizzE | Thor | | | Reg. Date | : | 12/07/2010 | Posts | : | 3,141 | Location | : | Sunnyvale, CA, United States |
|
| Posted : 13 Nov 2010 - 00:25 Post title : Re: shorty TOR's compared to long TOR's? (Re: CornerBanger) | | ugly bags of mostly water
|
|
| | daz | Zeus | | | Reg. Date | : | 12/05/2009 | Posts | : | 7,709 | Location | : | United States |
|
| Posted : 13 Nov 2010 - 01:31 Post title : Re: shorty TOR's compared to long TOR's? (Re: DizzE) | | Well i'll be damned....you're right. I showed 11.6 Lbs. I would have guess there could be close to 30 Lbs savings over all, but obviously i was WAAAAAAY off since the longs together are only about 23 Lbs. That floors me that the 2 together are only 23 Lbs ! I must be getting even weaker than i thought in my old age because they feel like they weight about 50 Lbs together when i lift the box with the 2 of them. I've always been pretty good when it comes to guessing quantities like speed, time, etc, but apparently weight is the exception big time !
| 2010 Blue/White Thunderbird, "Brutus". 1700 kit, short tors, gutted cat, UNI filter, filter seal off, custom tune. Brutus in his native habitat: Link
|
|
| | DizzE | Thor | | | Reg. Date | : | 12/07/2010 | Posts | : | 3,141 | Location | : | Sunnyvale, CA, United States |
|
| Posted : 13 Nov 2010 - 21:29 Post title : Re: shorty TOR's compared to long TOR's? (Re: daz) | | Smooth as an electric motor above 80....I like that. Straighten that right out. Dynamo hum.
I think some Pipes are for looks and these are for power. I like the look, the balance, sound and the new motor breath. But, it smells a bit rich w/TOR. Anyone else get that? Maybe I'm smelling the breakin?
|
|
| | daz | Zeus | | | Reg. Date | : | 12/05/2009 | Posts | : | 7,709 | Location | : | United States |
|
| Posted : 13 Nov 2010 - 22:05 Post title : Re: shorty TOR's compared to long TOR's? (Re: DizzE) | | Nope, but mine were used when i installed them so i suppose you could be smelling the break in. Try applying rotation on it's sugar plum.
| 2010 Blue/White Thunderbird, "Brutus". 1700 kit, short tors, gutted cat, UNI filter, filter seal off, custom tune. Brutus in his native habitat: Link
|
|
|
| |
| |
|